General Forums >> Music, Television, and Media Discussion >> Hillary Clinton Angry: What do you think?
Hillary Clinton Angry: What do you think?
|
270 posts back to top |
Posted 3 months ago According to The Independent, "the secretary of state bristled last night when — as she heard it — a Congolese university student asked what her husband thought about an international financial matter." Take a look and let us know what you think of the incident: "My husband's not the Secretary of State. I am." Editor | Excelle
|
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Hillary should be used to people asking about her high profile husband. Shame on her for wearing her feelings on her sleeve.
Connie |
|
63 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Good for her. The notion that a woman is being overly emotional when she is simply being as commanding of attention/blunt as any other man would be in her position is nauseating. |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Go Hillary!!!! Show them who's boss...lol |
|
4 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Good for her! The questioner didnt 'just ask' "What does Mr Clinton think?" Oh no, he took it much farther by saying "What does Mr Clinton think through the mouth of Mrs Clinton." That is akin to telling her that she is just a figurehead and cant possibly have an opinion of her own unless her husband gave her an opinion which she could then channel through her words. If she had simply answered the political part of the question, that wouldve been pivked up on by other people as well. This was like a slap in the face to her, and I commend her for refusing to playinto it- and Im not even much of a Hilary fan. |
|
8 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I agree with allsanitylost. Ms. Clinton has her own opinions and they are not her husbands. It was very sexist to be asked what her husband thought and she, being a woman, should follow her husbands thoughts and advice. She was very straightforward and direct in her response and I respect her for that. |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Frankly, Hilary needs to be more educated about the cultural influences of the countries she visits. This student's question was asked from his cultural perspective and should have been answered in like context. At the very least she should have been more polite about refusing to answer for her husband. I think she was rude and insensitive. Our value system in the U.S. may not be in line with that of the Congo, nor of many other nations. When we declare our freedom and equality to the world, should it be as an imposition to all other nations? I think not. That is completely contradictory to the idea of cultural pluralism we also declare. Hilary - Come home! You have made emough enemies! |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Her actions are a perfect example of why women (in general) have had to work twice as hard and twice as long as men. Rather than laughing it off and responding on her own behalf, she had to take it personally and respond in a most shameful manner. She was downright nasty. Bottomline, her husband was President, not her. She needs to realize that there will be some reference to him, regardless of his position now. Remember this is a position held by a professional; keep the emotions out of it or get out of the position. Refrain from making women look, once again, like weak and emotional creatures unable to handle simple verbal transactions.
|
|
22 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I actually think it's about time Mrs. Clinton stood up for herself. We still live in a society where men rule. I also like the fact that she met with this student and he did clarify the question. The news outlet did not show this. Mrs. Clinton is very virsatile and accepts a misunderstood questions and sets it straight. |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I think the gist and essense of Hillary's response was spot on. I applaud her for not falling into the trap of addressing such an ill-conceived question. That question did not merit a response, other than the one Hillary gave. Having said that, I do think she could have kept the emotions at an even keel, considering the fact that a lot could've been lost in translation from that student's question. However, I don't agree with another poster on how Hillary should've changed her response to be more sensitive to the culture in Congo. The response should've been the same, just the emotions brought down a few notches. |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I think what she said was fine, I think her tone of voice was totally not necessary. There are a million ways to tell someone they are wrong without sounding like a *itch. I am sure it is frustrating for her, however I felt her sulky-slouchy reply made her look weak and insecure. |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I think Mrs. Clinton handled the question appropriately - she is Secretary of State and still being treated by too many people as Bill's wife. She has always been held to a higher standard than any man or woman in equal situations would be because she is assertive and frank. I don't remember any other woman politician being grilled in an official capacity about her husband's viewpoints! I would also be interested to find out that any male politician has been asked to speak on his wife's views in an official capacity. Hey, Condoleeza Rice/Ann Richardson/Nancy Pelosi/Dianne Feinstein - would you like to tell us what your husband thinks through his wife's mouth? It doesn't happen! Hillary elicits the most amazing behavior in people - it's as if they forget that she's human, that she should just accept any behavior toward her to prove herself worthy. Cultural differences are not excuses to disrepect officials of other countries who visit the US, and US officials who visit other countries. |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I believe Mrs. Clinton handled that question appropriately. She IS the Secretary of State. I believe she got that message across in a very dignified manner. I also don't think it was appropriate of the student to ask this question. It almost sets the tone that Mr. Clinton's opinion of this issue (or any other asked in that context) is more important than the Secretary of State's. I think she did the right thing. Those that are making an issue of her response, I believe, don't like the fact that she stuck up for, not only herself, but also the position of the Secretary of State. |
|
Account Removed -1 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Hillary is her own person. It is not 1950! I thought her quip about her husband was witty. |
|
3 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I say good for Mrs. Clinton for standing up to her position! If anyone was offended, I say too bad!!! |
|
8 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I think we most all agree. It seems to me that Hillary has been overshadowed by her husband much of her public life. It may have been kind of a 'knee-jerk' reaction, but like so many of us Hillary continues to struggle to have her own voice heard without the echo of the male dominant voice (presence). |
|
5 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago In the high profile position that she has, she needs to be much more articulate than that, and should have a well thought out response to this situation. It is not a suprise that anyone asked her that question, her husband "was" The President of the US after all. If people think that his opinions do not influence her in any way they are surely nieve. Mrs SOS Clinton, a little bit of poise and humor would go a long way, lighten up! Can you imagine if Pres. Obama had responded like this to a question. Thank god she was not elected. Also, Hillary, you could use a little help from Clinton and Stacey, on "What not to Wear"! |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Oh Hillary, your insecurities are showing. Also, stop with the pantsuits. Start showing some leg!
|
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Good for Hillary for speaking up. She is the Secretary of State and I can't believe someone in the audience had the audicity to ask her what her husband thinks about this issue. I think she is a classy lady and if she was rude then so be it. It doesn't matter what country a student is from if they are going to ask a question ask it correctly and of the person for whom should be answering it not that of her husband.
|
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago kathybarnes63114 says ...
Kathy, you are kidding me right? I think she understands far more about cultural influences in other countries than you give her credit for. The student was out of line asking her a question about what her husband would say by channeling it through Hilary. It was evident, she did not understand the question and quite frankly if that had been a man up there and the same question was asked of him this subject would not be up for discussion. These students are quite bright despite their cultural influences and I would have expected the student to ask questions pertaining to Hilary's position on the issue not her husband's.
|
|
33 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago She is the Secretary of State! Shouldn't she be a little more skilled at being diplomatic?? Kristie Gibson
|
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago Hillary responded angrily at what she thought was a reference to her husband. This certainly gives us some insight into what is happening between her and Bill. After Bill's trip to Korea for the release of the two women, Hillary might be feeling undermined like "why couldn't that have been me since I am Secretary of State." And I am not sure if after you were running for President can you truly be ok with being The Secretary of State especially if you aren't getting the proper respect. After some hemming and hawing, I would surmise that Hilary took the position because she likes being in politics, getting out of the house (that is not a home) and doing something significant. She is too smart to do nothing of importance. Can't say I blame her. I guess after the African incident, thought, she will try to keep her emotions in check. One last point, why are women always expected to alter their temperament like we aren't entitled to one? |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Just came back to this topic to see what else had been posted after my comment. Wow! What is is about Hillary [and people] that brings out comments on her clothes, her marriage, her insecurities? I think the comments say a whole lot more about the posters than they do about SOS Hillary Clinton, and it bothers me that such rabid judgementalism is all that so many can think of to do with their precious freedoms as Americans. All over the world, people are dying by the hundreds of thousands because they don't enjoy the freedoms that most Americans take for granted, and all some of us can think of is whether our secretary of state should wear pantsuits or shows enough leg! Just think of our sons and daughters in Iraq and Afghanistan fighting to protect their rights to say those things... |


